Showing posts with label thanksgiving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thanksgiving. Show all posts

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Yaakov's Thanksgiving Meals

Parshat Vayetze

by Rabbi Avi Billet


In the aftermath of a horrific tragedy in Israel, a letter composed by widows of the murdered gave comfort to so many because they have a life-focus that appreciates the role God plays in their lives.

Combine that focus with a nod to Thanksgiving, and we proceed.
            
While the meals in the book of Bereshit share a common theme of thanksgiving – Avraham and Lot are appreciative of their guests, Avraham celebrates his son’s birth, Yitzchak makes peace with Avimelekh, and tries to celebrate his relationship Eisav when sending him to prepare a meal – Yaakov’s meals are a little more suspect.
            
Some argue that the meal served to Eisav was acelebratory meal to seal the deal over what was a cash purchase of the birthright. We assume Yaakov partakes of the meal at his wedding. And he eats with Lavan when they part ways at the end of our parsha.
            
Perhaps the first one can be viewed as a thanksgiving. But can we say the same for the wedding and the meal with Lavan?  There is a “Mishteh” celebration at his marriage to Leah, but none when he marries Rachel. Why?
             
The Midrash Sechel Tov explains that there was only fare at Leah’s celebration because Lavan had “bought” the guests. Everyone knew he was a trickster. No one wanted to come. But he reminded them that they had been blessed with water ever since Yaakov’s arrival (recall the stone on the well episode). He therefore planned to marry Leah to him first to preserve his presence in Aram. He convinced everyone to give gifts so Yaakov would think all was legitimate, and then he took the gifts and sold them to pay for the drinks of the “mishteh” [Avraham made a “mishteh gadol” – which implies more than just drinks – just like Achashveirosh in the story of Esther.] The Toldos Yitzchak claims that Lavan was cheap, and “only” served drinks, while the Daas Zekenim suggested Lavan’s plan was to get Yaakov drunk so he would not notice Leah was standing where Rachel should have been.
            
If Lavan was so cheap, why have the party at all? Because, Malbim explains, Lavan needed people to agree to the "rule" he was making up that the older daughter marries first. He had never mentioned it before because it was made up to justify his behavior. And with everyone around agreeing, Yaakov would never suspect such a public rouse.
            
This is why there was no celebratory meal after the marriage to Rachel. Yaakov was stuck in Lavan-town for another seven years. That’s nothing for him to celebrate. And there was no way people were going to contribute again to help Lavan make a second party. They had participated in a sham celebration as a charade, had already given their gifts, and didn’t even get food to show for their gift. There was no real celebration.
            
The meal Yaakov shares with Lavan, after telling Lavan why he finds him to be despicable is more of the sealing of a cold-peace between nations that hate each other but just don’t want to fight anymore.
            
Yaakov invites them, as Radak says, “So they can eat together to remember their treaty, just before they part ways.”
            
Lavan leaves in the morning. We never hear from him again. How did he feel? Was he at peace? Or was he stewing over the peace he was coerced into making? We don't know. But we do know that he is out of the picture, and as far as we know he doesn't cross the line he agrees never to cross.
            
Is it a celebration for Yaakov? Is it really a Thanksgiving meal?
            
In a sense it is! Lavan agrees never to bother Yaakov again, and as far as we know, he doesn't! Whether he is upset about how it went down – he remains out of the picture and he and Yaakov have peace between them!
            
Every Thanksgiving is an opportunity for us to express our gratitude for the good in our lives, and for the existence we can enjoy if we put the past behind us and move on with our lives. We don't forget the past, but we move on with the status quo. Or we try to improve the status quo with the materials and opportunities that lie before us.
            
Lavan didn't like what he had to hear, but he did recognize that Yaakov had a right to move on with his life and that after 20 years of struggling with one another, that it was time to move on.
            
When real peace was made, Yaakov was so ready to let bygones be bygones that he viewed all his adversaries as his "brothers." For Yaakov, this was a real Thanksgiving. A real blessing. He was now in charge of his own destiny and Lavan would never stand in his way again.
            
The State of Israel deals with Lavan on a regular basis. Lavan says “everything you have and worked for is mine mine mine.” Lavan cares more that Yaakov suffer than he cares to look in his own backyard to address the suffering of his people that is in his hands to prevent or deal with.
            
When Lavan has to go out on his own and create his own destiny, he can use his experience to make his life better. The ball is in his court.
            
Until today’s Lavans decide to acknowledge the celebratory meal of peace, and, if need be, live a cold-peace just because “none of us want to fight anymore,” the objective we yearn for will not be achieved. And it will be Lavan’s fault.

Just as the forefathers had their Thanksgiving meals celebrating specific events, we too have Thanksgiving and God in our lives to be thankful for. We mourn for lost life. But we continue to look forward to the day when Thanksgiving is not just a once a year celebration, but a year-round celebration for the eternal peace that will one day settle upon the Holy Land.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Veyetze Sermon - Thanksgivings of the Forefathers (Israel and Gaza)


Vayetze: Thanksgivings of the Forefathers
Rabbi Avi Billet

          Over the extended weekend, I was privy to a number of emails, online articles and Facebook postings of what people "are thankful for." This being the Thanksgiving Weekend, this concept is highly appropriate. In our own personal experiences, most of us surely have lists – they may be quite similar to one another, but of course they're not the same.
          Many people are grateful for a home to live in, a free country, family, etc.
          This week was a very emotional week for many of us, thinking about the situation in Israel; some of us have family there, or relatives in the army, and our thoughts and prayers go out to those who continue to endure what no peace loving nation should need to endure.
          Here is a short list of some of the things I am grateful for:
          Love him or hate him – I am grateful for Glenn Beck, one of the only individuals in any form of media who articulately expressed Israel's side and threw all the blame of Hamas and their terror into the corner in which it resides. If you haven't seen or heard thethings he shared during the recent conflict, you must find it on youtube or theblaze.com and listen to what an אוהב ישראל sounds like. (see here where he speaks of the three people killed by rockets)
          I am grateful for a ceasefire only if it really means no more rockets flying into Israel. Beyond that, I am not much of a fan as I would prefer Israel destroy all of Hamas infrastructure and send them back to the Middle Ages where they prefer to live. But I am not a politician and my opinion does not hold any sway in Israel.
          I am grateful for the support given by the State Department and the President to Israel's right to defend itself. I question why they only step in to intervene after Israel strikes back and not while all the rockets are flying, and my conclusion is that even the current State Department does not care much about Jewish blood. They will "allow" Israel to defend itself, but not too much. Once the Jew fights back, no one can stand it. They'll defend the right to self-defense, but they won't defend the right to live in peace without rockets terrorizing peaceful civilians.
          So while I appreciate the things which were said, I still think they were cowards in not stopping the rockets years earlier. Jewish life remains cheap, and "Jewish might" remains something which is admirable, but not something which is allowed to show itself for more than a week at a time.
          While I choose to be critical for all that was unsaid over the years, I am also thankful to the US for its role in supporting the Iron Dome missile defense system which undoubtedly saved many many lives and prevented significant damage in many ways.
          But I planned to talk about the Thanksgivings of the Forefathers – and in that vein, I am referring to their Thanksgiving dinners.
         While they did not likely have Turkey and stuffing or pumpkin pie, there are many meals which are described in the book of Bereishis, and they do share a common theme: Thanksgiving – a note of שהחיינו וקימינו והגיענו לזמן הזה. Surely the Avos ate on a daily basis, but the meals which are noted include the following:
          Avraham's meals – when the three guests came after his bris milah, when Yitzchak is weaned. One might say a meal was hosted for Eliezer when he is making the proposals to Rivkah on behalf of the patriarchal family - it's a sort of "L'Chaim" or engagement meal.
          Yitzchak's meals – when he makes peace with Avimelekh, and the foods Yaakov and Eisav bring to him
          Yaakov's meals – Yaakov serves a meal to Eisav in last week's parsha, and I discovered an approach in the meforshimthat suggests it was a celebratory meal shared with Eisav, to seal the deal ofthe purchase of the bechora, which the Daat Zekenim and others claim was over a large sum of cash. The meal is compared to Yaakov's final meal described in the Torah – the one when he makes peace with Lavan at the end of the sidrah. The other meal in which Yaakov partakes – or at least we assume he does – is at his wedding.
          Avraham's meals are self-explanatory: Post-bris, Avraham celebrates life and the opportunity to continue to do Chesed. He is bringing guests into his home. There's no indication that Avraham pulled all the stops in celebrating Yitchak's bris. But he did make a משתה גדול when Yitzchak was weaned. I guess he appreciated being able to sleep through the night again.
          Yitzchak's meals come when he makes peace with an adversary – Avimelekh, who stole and stuffed his wells, and who made life difficult for him; and at a time in his life when he seems to be looking to pass the baton. He isn't getting any younger, he is concerned he may die soon, and he wants to give Eisav the opportunity to do a mitzvah so he (Eisav) can receive a blessing as a reward. The ability to raise a child and live so long to bless him when he is well on in his mature years – Eisav and Yaakov were 63 when the blessing incident took place – is something to be thankful for.
          Which leaves us with Yaakov's meals. In Yaakov's case, irony abounds. There is a משתה when he marries לאה, but no celebration when he marries רחל. 13 years later he has a meal with a man he despises, after he articulates in no uncertain terms why he finds the man to be despicable – and if I could take out-of-context a joke I read-as-a-child in MAD Magazine, perhaps the only nice thing Yaakov could say about Lavan is that he happens to be Yaakov's father in law. Maybe we can also say he likes Lavan's daughters too.
          Just about every other meal celebrates something special – a bris, a chesed opportunity, a weaning, kibud av va'em, peace with a rival.
          Here there's a celebration at one wedding, but no celebration at the one where we would most expect it, and the peace with Lavan is not like with Avimelekh – it's more of the cold peace that exists between two enemy nations who don't really like one another but don't want to fight anymore either. You stay on your side and I'll stay on mine and we will have nothing to do with one another.
          Is this a celebration? Is this a Thanksgiving?
          The answer is that Yaakov's meals were different from everyone else's, because Yaakov was dealing with the biggest trickster the Torah has ever known. The Toldos Yitzchak explains the difference between Lavan and others: we saw clearly with Avraham and Lot (who I did not mention earlier because he is not one of the Avos) that when they serve a meal, they serve FOOD. Lavan, on the other hand, only served משתה – drinks! – so that as the Daas Zekenim points out as well – Yaakov would get drunk and would not notice that Leah was standing where Rachel should have been.
          Lavan wasn't only a low-life, he was cheap! We are told ויאסוף לבן את כל אנשי המקום ויעש משתה.  He gathered all the people together to make this משתה. Why? Since when does the Torah tell us about those who gather for a celebration, beyond the people whom the celebration honors? Never! We don't hear about Avraham's party list when he made a משתה גדול ביום הגמל את יצחק.
          The Malbim explains that Lavan only invited people so they could agree to the "rule" he was making up that "It is not done in our land to marry off the younger before the older." If he just made it up, Yaakov wouldn't believe him. But with the whole wedding party, Lavan stacks the vote in his direction "proving" that that's the custom. Why did he never mention it before to Yaakov? Because it was a fabrication – made up to justify his behavior. And, of course, Yaakov would never suspect a ruse was being pulled in front of so many people.
          And why did he need to justify it? Was he really trying to marry off Leah? The Midrash says it was a ruse to get Yaakov to stick around, because Lavan had been blessed on account of Yaakov's presence. Midrash Sechel Tov fleshes out the story suggesting that Lavan is called Lavan Ha'Arami because he was Lavan HaRamai – the trickster. He reminded everyone that they had been blessed with water ever since Yaakov came (recall the well incident with the stone – having a stone on a well indicates the need for rationing), and Lavan wanted to preserve Yaakov's presence in Aram. To that end, he suggested to his neighbors that he will marry Leah off to Yaakov, knowing he'd agree to stick around for another seven years in exchange for marrying Rachel. He convinced everyone to give gifts so Yaakov would be convinced all was legit - but then he (Lavan) sold the gifts to buy the food (whatever that may have been) for the celebratory meal. Using their own money - a party made from everyone's contributions.
          This is why there was no celebratory meal after the marriage to Rachel. Yaakov was stuck in Lavan-town for another seven years. That’s nothing for him to celebrate. And there was no way people were going to contribute again to help Lavan make a second meal. They had participated in a quote unquote celebration as a charade. Therefore there was no real celebration.
          With regard to the meal at the end of the parsha, after Lavan chases Yaakov, accuses him of stealing his daughters, Yaakov's children, and Lavan's belongings, they have a conversation which concludes with an agreement to leave one another alone.
          At that point, Yaakov sees all of Lavan's people as brothers and invites them for a meal:
The Radak describes Yaakov's intent in this way: עשה סעודה ומשתה כדי שיאכלו ביחד בהפרדם זה מזה לזכרון הברית:
          Lavan leaves in the morning. We never hear from him again. How did he feel? Was he at peace? Or was he stewing over the peace he was coerced into making? We don't know. But we do know that he is out of the picture, and as far as we know he doesn't cross the line he agrees never to cross.
          Is it a celebration for Yaakov? Is it really a Thanksgiving meal?
          In a sense it is! Lavan agrees never to bother Yaakov again, and as far as we know, he doesn't! Whether he is broygez about how it went down – he remains out of the picture and he and Yaakov have peace between them!
          Every Thanksgiving is an opportunity for us to express out gratitude for the good in our lives, and for the existence we can enjoy if we put the past behind us and move on with our lives. We don't forget the past, but we move on with the status quo. Or we try to improve the status quo with the materials and opportunities that lie before us.
          This is the challenge the State of Israel faces – with an enemy led by a Lavan-style leadership who are deceitful, who lie, who use Israel's humanitarian aid against Israel; who care more that Yaakov suffer than they care to look in their own backyard to address the suffering of their people that is in their hands to prevent or deal with.
          Lavan didn't like what he had to hear, but he did recognize that Yaakov had a right to move on with his life and that after 20 years of struggling with one another, that it was time to move on.
          When real peace was made, Yaakov was so ready to let bygones be bygones that he viewed all his adversaries as his "brothers." For Yaakov, this was a real Thanksgiving. A real blessing. He was now in charge of his own destiny and Lavan would never stand in his way again.
          Lavan is also in charge of his own destiny. He is no longer blessed with Yaakov's presence. But he can learn from the good Yaakov did, the blessing Yaakov brought to Lavan's home, and he can use his experience to make his life better. The ball is in his court.
I strongly believe that aside from the obvious reason, the State of Israel is Yaakov, and the choice Lavan faced is the choice the Arabs face today. They can embrace the reality of Israel בשמחה, or they can be broygez about it while they realize Israel is not going anywhere.
          But until they decide to acknowledge the celebratory meal of peace, there will not be peace in the region. And I do not believe it will be Israel's fault.
          The world has its narrative – some are Israel's allies, and some such as CNN – ChamasNews Network – will continue to be anything but.
Just as the Avos had their Thanksgiving meals celebrating specific events, we too have Thanksgiving and the simchas in our lives to be thankful for. But we continue to look forward to the day when Thanksgiving is not just a once a year celebration, but a year-round celebration for the eternal peace that will one day settle on our homeland and our Holy Land, במהרה בימינו אמן.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Successful REKA program

On Thursday, aka Thanksgiving, the REKA program was inaugurated at the Young Israel of Hollywood.
From the REKA flyer:

REKA (רקע) means background. As a Jew you may be aware of or familiar with various every day religious practices. But do you know how the methods of performance are informed by Jewish law, history and sociology? We invite you to empower yourself with the knowledge you need to be an "informed Jew" so you can make sensible decisions based on the facts. The classes will not present a conclusion. Rather, various approaches and differing opinions will be presented, leaving you to be the judge and jury in taking charge of your Judaism.

Our first topic was "Views on Others' Holidays" - a discussion about to what degree we may or may not participate in the celebration of American holidays, whether they come from secular sources, or even other-religion sources but have become for the most part completely secularized with no religious significance.

The main sources I used for a starting point were these two articles written by Rabbi Michael Broyde - on Thanksgiving, and on Valentines Day. (The Thanksgiving article also appeared in the RJJ Journal of Halakha and Contemporary Society, Vol XXX - without the addendum about Halloween which appears in the online version.)

We also explored the history and sociology of legal holidays through different articles and webpages accessed on the web, including howstuffworks.com and google searches on the origins of the Christmas tree and other traditions. Here, for example, is a well researched article about the history of Thanksgiving.

Rabbi Bryode summarizes his arguments about what makes or breaks a Jews permissibility to participate in a celebration created by non-Jews.

In general, Rama (YD 178:1) seems to posit that in order to permit engaging in conduct that might have pagan origins, one must show one of four things.

· The debated activity has a secular origin or value.

· The conduct the individuals engage in can be rationally explained independent of the gentile holiday or event.

· The pagan origins of are so deeply hidden that they have disappeared, and the celebrations con be attributed to some secular source or reason.

· The activities memorialized are actually consistent with the Jewish tradition.

We tried to apply the litmus test to the aforementioned holidays, with mixed results.

Holding them up to purely American dates such as Memorial Day, Labor Day, Mothers and Fathers Days, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Election Day, Presidents Day, Independence Day - particularly in that most of them are "celebrated" (much like Lag BaOmer) with outdoor activities and Barbecues, or just a day off from work, they don't present a problem of commemoration: None of them have noticeable religious origins.

In SUMMARY
It was a great inauguration of the REKA program. Hopefully we'll have even more people in attendance on the coming legal holidays, with the interesting topics we have lined up.

Lastly - as a credit to those who came, here are the last few lines of Rabbi Broyde's article on Thanksgiving:

Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik would reschedule shiur on Thanksgiving day, so that shiur started earlier, and ended earlier, allowing the celebration of Thanksgiving. It is important to note the Torah study was not canceled, or even curtailed. Rather, the day was rearranged to allow for a full compliment of Torah, hand in hand with the requisite "civil celebrations." That too is an important lesson in how we should mark Thanksgiving.

Torah learning must be an integral part of what we do, and how we function. Sometimes, because of the needs of the times or our duties as citizens, we undertake tasks that appear to conflict with our need to study and learn Torah. But yet we must continue to learn and study. Thus, Rabbi Soloveitchik did not cancel shiur on Thanksgiving. We, too, should not forget that lesson. Torah study must go on.