Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Eliyahu HaNavi and Night Time Salvation

Pesach 5786

A Sermon by Rabbi Avi Billet

Beyond Israel’s now 78 year war with its local enemies, the current military action in Iran is the first time another power has gotten involved on the offensive, advancing shared interests with the Jewish State. In the past some countries have provided weapons to Israel to help Israel fight her own fight. And the Patriot missiles, a not-as-good-as-Iron Dome method of intercepting missiles was used in the 1991 Iraq War. That war, as many surely recall, started after Iraq invaded Kuwait. And while Israel was not involved, Saddam Hussein had threatened that if the US invades, he’d shoot missiles at Israel. Which he did. 

That war put Israel on alert to put bomb shelters in all new construction, including houses and apartment buildings. Some are actually in apartments and are for the use of the family living there, while some are in the basements of buildings and are more communal. 

Anyway, while we pray for our brothers and sisters across the globe, this current war being as I described a moment ago is the first time another nation – in this case the United States – has taken up a fight that, in a way, is ostensibly looking out for the interests of the largest population of Jews on the planet since the Holocaust. 

 We, the collective Jewish people, should be grateful for Israel’s defense systems, and allies who help them get them. 

Our Haggadah references the salvation of the Jewish people at various stages in our history, in a passage written by Yannai of the 6th or 7th century, which is in the section we call Nirtzah. 

 ובכן ויהי בחצי הלילה – And so, it happened at midnight 

This passage speaks of events that all happened, per the Pesukim which report upon them in Tanakh, in the middle of the night (not necessarily at Chatzos). Avraham’s battles – יחלק עליהם לילה. Avimelekh having a dream to leave Sarah alone. Lavan having a dream to leave Yaakov alone. Yaakov wrestling with the angel, which some interpret its goal as giving him the confidence that he can face Eisav, took place ויאבק איש עמו עד עלות השחר. Sisera’s army was defeated by Barak and Devorah because they got lost in reading the stars incorrectly. Sannacherib withdrew from fighting Chizkiyahu when his army mysteriously died overnight. Daniel was given interpretations to Nevuchadnezzar’s dream in his own dream. Balshezzar, who had stolen from the Mikdash, was killed in the nighttime (Daniel, end of chapter 5). Achashveirosh was UNABLE to sleep and he was told about how Mordechai had saved him… just as Haman came in – in the middle of the night. This story happened during Chol Hamoed Pesach, or perhaps the second night of Yom Tov! (which raises a whole lot of questions – but that is not our topic today). 

ALL of this is referring to how there is a concept of Leil Shimmurim. Not only on Pesach specifically, but possible at other times as well. The following insights on this piyyut were offered by Rabbi Zvi Dov Kanatopsky, in a sermon he delivered Pesach of 1945 as WWII was clearly nearing its end.

 אז רוב נסים הפלאת בלילה – You wondrously performed a multitude of miracles at night. It is as though the Jew is reassuring himself that he need not fear the darkness of the night. 

 קרב יום אשר הוא לא יום ולא לילה – a day is coming which is neither day or night 

 The future holds doubt and uncertainties. We see neither the sunlight of day nor the dark shadows of the night. Within the uncertainty lies the fear – תאיר כאור יום חשכת לילה – May you brighten the darkness of the night as the light of the day, is how the passage concludes. 

 Rabbi Kanotopsky lamented how England at the time had the Mandate over Palestine, and the concern that after the war, Churchill would say, echoing Achashveirosh before him, עד חצי המלכות ותעש. You can have a place to live, but we will remain in charge of it (which seems to even be what Balfour had in mind in the famous declaration associated with his name – which is a larger discussion about the history of that time period and the role of the United Kingdom…).

 So Rabbi Kanatopsky said “If the Jew does look forward to a redeemed world, it can only be in the form of Passover – in the form of a COMPLETE redemption – which includes the return of Israel’s land to its rightful owner.”

 And I’ll add, which should obviously be accompanied by peace in the land, without animus towards the Jewish State and the Holy Land, and the Jewish people. This objective has hardly been met over the course of Israel’s existence. I don’t think I need to go into detail about Israel’s wars, Intifadas, October 7, and now. 

 Yeshayahu Chapter 21: 
 12Said the watchman, "Morning has come, and also night. If you will request, request. Return and come." יבאָמַ֣ר שֹׁמֵ֔ר אָתָ֥א בֹ֖קֶר וְגַם־לָ֑יְלָה אִם־תִּבְעָי֥וּן בְּעָ֖יוּ שֻׁ֥בוּ אֵתָֽיוּ: 

 This is, essentially, a call to Teshuva for the Jewish people. In their time the prophets exhorted the Jewish people to do Teshuva, and as we turn to the prophets for their messages even today, their exhortations remain relevant to our experience. If we truly wish to experience a full Geulah, this is a necessary component of getting there. 

 Noting that there are 4 לשונות של גאולה that are often tied to the 4 cups of wine, and that those familiar with the text in Parshas Va’era know there is a 5th word – והבאתי – that is not associated with a cup of wine, Rabbi Kanotopsky noted that the 5th cup is a strange one indeed. We pour it and we don’t drink it? We’re going to wait for Eliyahu to come to drink it? How long must we wait?

 And so he suggested that if instead of waiting for him to come we took the cup in our own hands and brought it a little closer to him, then we would see results. 

 81 Pesachs later, we can all attest to the creation of the Jewish State and the amazing things that have been accomplished there. But we also know that the Final Geulah has not been achieved. Will there be אור and יום, or will חשך and לילה rule the day? Israel’s might is known. But there is always uncertainty – no matter where we live.

 While I don’t have an answer for uncertainty – its very name doesn’t allow for an answer – the anomaly of the 5th cup is something Rabbi Jonathan Sacks addressed on different occasions. His explanation for it and its name are quite compelling. Noting the preponderance of the number 4 at the Seder – 4 cups, 4 questions, 4 sons, 4 terms of Geulah, he notes how there are also 4 verses that we expound upon from the verses of “Arami Oved Avi.”

 Interestingly, each of these either has or had a 5th item. The Lubavitcher Rebbe famously said the 5th son is the one who is not at the table either out of anger, rebelliousness, or even laziness. Or, perhaps, it is those Jews lost to assimilation. 

 There is a question that appears in the Mishneh that is not in our Mah Nishtanah – שבכל הלילות אנו אוכלין בשר צלי שלוק ומבושל הלילה הזה כולו צלי On all other nights we eat meat whether cooked, boiled, or roasted. But tonight only roasted. This question disappeared after the Churban since we were no longer bringing a Korban Pesach. Instead we ask about sitting or leaning.

 There is a 5th verse in the Arami Oved Avi paragraph, but it is irrelevant to the Seder evening because it references 

 9And He brought us to this place, and He gave us this land, a land flowing with milk and honey. טוַיְבִאֵ֖נוּ אֶל־הַמָּק֣וֹם הַזֶּ֑ה וַיִּתֶּן־לָ֨נוּ֙ אֶת־הָאָ֣רֶץ הַזֹּ֔את אֶ֛רֶץ זָבַ֥ת חָלָ֖ב וּדְבָֽשׁ: 

The same concept holds true for the 5th term of Geulah referenced earlier – והבאתי – which focuses on coming to the land, and is less relevant to the Seder evening. 

 Which leaves us with the 5th cup – and we’ve already seen the conundrum as Rabbi Kanatopsky presented it. Rabbi Sacks notes how there is a debate, based on a statement of Rabbi Tarfon that “we recite Hallel over a 5th cup” as to whether a. there should be a 5th cup, and b. whether one should drink it, may drink it, or should not be drinking it. This is a debate amongst such luminaries as...

 Rashi and Tosafos - there is no 5th cup 

 Rambam – there is a 5th cup, but it is optional.  

 Ravad – there is a 5th cup and one should drink it. It is praiseworthy to do so (what we’d call in contemporary language “a mitzvah” but not that we could point to as an actual “mitzvah”/commandment). 

 So the compromise position was to pour it and not drink it. And to resolve what we should do, the Talmudic solution is for Eliyahu HaNavi to answer the question. תיקו – תשבי יתרץ קושיות ואבעיות. We’ll leave the cup question until Eliyahu comes. Thus it is known as the כוס אליהו. 

 Not because Eliyahu is the Jewish Santa. But because we wait for him to come to know what this component of Pesach is supposed to look like. 

 Rabbi Sacks concludes his essay (which was written 30 years ago or so) 

 “In the half century since the Holocaust the Jewish people has emerged from darkness to light. The State of Israel has come into being. The Hebrew language has been reborn. Jews have been brought to safety from the countries where they faced persecution. In the liberal democracies of the West Jews have gained freedom, and even prominence and affluence.” 

 though in the middle of a quote here, please note this quick story. In his book The Will to Live On, Herman Wouk recounts about how he visited David Ben Gurion at his home in the Negev in 1955. To get there he was in a command car, escorted by a jeep with a mounted machine gun because there were regular attacks against journeyors by fedayeen from Egypt and Gaza. As it was nearing sunset, Ben Gurion encouraged them to leave telling his wife “they have to get back to Tel Aviv before dark.” Then he said “You must return here to live. This is the only place for Jews like you. Here you will be free.” 

 Free? Wouk replied! With enemy armies ringing you, with their leaders publicly threatening to wipe out ‘the Zionist entity ,’ with your roads impassable after sundown… Free?

 I did not say safe, the old man retorted. I said free. 

 Anyway – Rabbi Sacks continues… 

 “But Israel is not yet at peace. In the Diaspora assimilation continues apace. Many Jews are estranged from their people and their faith. Something is missing from our celebration” – all those 5th items, which can be summarized to be referencing an incompleteness in the family, both on a local level and in the larger Jewish family, an absence of Beit HaMikdash, an absence of all of us living in Eretz Yisrael, an absence of a Final Geulah. 

 “That is a measure of what is still to be achieved. We have not yet reached our destination. These missing items remind us of work still to be done, a journey not yet complete.” 

 Rabbi Sacks was well aware of anti-Semitism. He spoke of it often enough. He didn’t live to see the dark turn it would take in October 7 and its aftermath. But clearly both he and Rabbi Kanotopsky, though of different generations, noted darkness and light and where we hope the shoe will drop, for us and all of Israel. 

 ובכן ויהי בחצי הלילה. With the darkness we sometimes feel when we think of all we’ve been through, what our people have been through, and all that is still going on, we can take solace that salvation can come in the darkest part of the night. When we aim to re-experience Geulah, we are part way there. When we do the Teshuvah the prophet spoke of, we will certainly be closer. 

 May Hashem see us for who we are, what we are doing, and where we wish to be. And as He did then, may He send salvation once again in the darkest part of the night, so we – all the Jewish people – may experience the light of the ultimate Geulah.

Friday, March 27, 2026

Put in the Time to Prepare for the Big Day

Parshat Tzav  / Shabbos HaGadol

 by Rabbi Avi Billet 

In the last four verses of the parsha, we see the warning and instruction given to the Kohanim as to where they are supposed to be for the 7 days leading up to the “Yom HaShmini” that will be described in the coming Parsha with chapter 9. 

 Verse 33 - And you shall not leave the entrance of the Tent of Meeting for seven days, until the day of the completion of your investiture days, he will inaugurate you for seven days. 

Verse 35 - And you shall stay day and night for seven days at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting. You shall observe the Lord's command, so that you will not die, for thus I was commanded. 

I would argue that the message is clear. But is it? Are they stuck at the opening of the Tent of Meeting (Ohel Moed) for 7 days? What if someone needs a break? Or to relieve oneself? 

The Ro”sh makes an interesting comment as he notes the tradition that Moshe assembled the Mishkan each morning and disassembled it each night for the period of the 7 Inaugural days. While he doesn’t say this straight out, it could be suggested that the “rule” in question was only applicable while the Mishkan was standing. Once Moshe took it down at night, there is no longer an “opening of the Mishkan” to which they are confined. 

 Anyway, if that explanation is irrelevant, Chizkuni explains that the nighttime is for exactly the purpose of relieving oneself. His exact language (8:33) is “They shall not involve themselves with anything else, they should not go to another place. However, at night they may go out to take care of their needs (a euphemism for restroom activity). An example of [this kind of Bible-talk is] ‘and they cried for Moshe for 30 days’ as if to suggest there was no moment when they weren’t crying (?). And also ‘and you shall dwell in sukkahs for 7 days’ [does anyone stay exclusively in the sukkah for 7 straight days?]. And so too ‘and from the Mikdash he shall not leave.” In other words, that is their base, they have a task to do, but a short break is certainly reasonable and understandable. 

 Ramban and Rabbenu Bachaye are more direct, in quoting a “Braisa Shel Toras Kohanim” that the verse is simply instructing that there is no leaving that area, day and night, while there is Avodah (Mishkan service) that needs to be done. As long as there is work to do, their place is the Mishkan. When the service of the day is over, they are free to go. 

 Rabbenu Bachaye gives similar examples per the comment of Chizkuni (above) noting that the verses in Melachim describe the building of the Beis HaMikdash for 7 years, and the building of Shlomo’s palace for 13 years. Obviously the workers took breaks, including for Shabbos and Yom Tov, as the intention is that the work – over those periods of time – was ongoing on days which were work-worthy. So too, here, they were to be in the Mishkan when there was work to be done for the day. 
 Rabbenu Bachaye goes on, quoting a Midrash Tanchuma, which suggests the 7 days they were to sit at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting refers to the 7 days of mourning for Nadav and Avihu. This is similar to the 7 day waiting period before the Flood began (Bereshis 7:10), indicating that there is meant to be a 7-day mourning period before the event of devastation. 

The problem, obviously, is that in general we don’t know when disaster will strike, and so the time to mourn is after the event. God, however, who sees the future and is All-Knowing, knows what will be happening and so He gave them the tools for staying focused on the task at hand, and of being close to their brothers and sons for this 7 day period. 

No matter how we look at it, it is clear that the 7-day period is preparation for the Big Day, the day in which the Mishkan would be fully delegated and consecrated and put into action. 

 And sometimes a time commitment is necessary when seriously preparing for a Big Day. 

 This is a message for Shabbos HaGadol – the rabbi of a community prepares a special Drasha to help a community go into the holiday better prepared for the holiday. 

 It is worth the time of the congregation to make the effort to attend a Shabbos HaGadol drasha – take a serious amount of time to prepare for the Big Day, or should I say the Big Evening, the night of the Seder, when we intend to relive our collective experience of going out of Egypt. 

 May all rabbis give successful Drashas, and may their audiences be inspired to have a Chag Kasher V’Sameach, a very special Pesach holiday!

Friday, March 20, 2026

The Leader and the People

Parshat Vayikra

by Rabbi Avi Billet

Vayikra chapter 4 presents a few scenarios where either an individual or a leader sins or causes others to sin. What is the penalty? Who is responsible? 

ויקרא פרק ד - (ג) אִ֣ם הַכֹּהֵ֧ן הַמָּשִׁ֛יחַ יֶחֱטָ֖א לְאַשְׁמַ֣ת הָעָ֑ם וְהִקְרִ֡יב עַ֣ל חַטָּאתוֹ֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר חָטָ֜א פַּ֣ר בֶּן־בָּקָ֥ר תָּמִ֛ים לַיקֹוָ֖ק לְחַטָּֽאת:

4:3 – “If the anointed Kohen sins, to the blame of the people, he is to bring a sin offering for the sin he perpetrated…”


 This seems pretty straightforward. The man is responsible to bring the offering in question. And while 4:13 introduces a scenario in which all of the people do something wrong, and thus must bring a communal sacrifice, it does not follow that that case is specifically connected to the one in the verse above.

Let us explore three ways of looking at what happened here, causing this breakdown in behavior. 

Even the Accidental Sin 

A. This verse (4:3) is meant to be a warning to the Kohen, of how he is to conduct himself on account of his being in such a position. People look to him, people admire him, people see him as a model of behavior, a leader to emulate on account of his position, his stature, and the role he plays in their lives. Rabbi Yaakov Loiberbaum of Lisa explained the verse to suggest that if he sins, even by accident (בשוגג), this is to the detriment of the congregation and the community, because what they see him doing is seen as being upright, ethical, proper, and allowed. This gives people license, even unwittingly and unwillingly, to do the wrong thing, simply because they saw this behavior or this action perpetrated by the anointed Kohen. 

Friday, March 13, 2026

Why is Kindling Fire Mentioned Exclusively as a Shabbos Prohibition?

Parshat VAYAKHEL - Fekudei

by Rabbi Avi Billet

In opening the parsha with an announcement about Shabbos, Moshe Rabbenu singles out the kindling of fire as something that should not be done on the holy day. Some of the commentaries note that this singling out demonstrates that just as this is forbidden, all of the categories of Melakha (creative labors) are forbidden on Shabbos. 

 This is a classic rabbinic analysis which simplifies a more complex issue, while essentially side-stepping the question of why was this prohibition singled out? 

The Pesikta (and Chizkuni and others) note that the Torah’s indication that you are not to kindle fire “in your dwelling places” excludes the Mikdash, where handling and dealing with fire, for the sake of the sacrificial order, is permitted on Shabbos. (אש תמיד תוקד על המזבח) 

Ramban quotes Rabbi Nosson, in a statement found in the Mechilta, who says that when Moshe gathered the people, the assumption everyone made was that it would be permitted to light a candle and to heat up food, and to make a fire on Shabbos (probably because inherently, fire by itself is not a creative labor), so Moshe needed to single it out. Rabbi Nosson (Ramban explains) says the Torah is not needed to tell us that baking, cooking, and other activities for food preparation are forbidden because we are told that in the context of the Mon (manna), that it would need to be prepared before Shabbos. 

Friday, March 6, 2026

Moshe's Mask

Parshat Ki Tisa

by Rabbi Avi Billet

It is important to read the verses in question, to understand what the Torah says. The following text and translation can be found here

29And it came to pass when Moses descended from Mount Sinai, and the two tablets of the testimony were in Moses' hand when he descended from the mountain and Moses did not know that the skin of his face had become radiant while He had spoken with him

30that Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses and behold! the skin of his face had become radiant, and they were afraid to come near him.

31But Moses called to them, and Aaron and all the princes of the community returned to him, and Moses would speak to them.

32Afterwards all the children of Israel would draw near, and he would command them everything that the Lord had spoken with him on Mount Sinai.

33When Moses had finished speaking with them, he placed a covering over his face.

34When Moses would come before the Lord to speak with Him, he would remove the covering until he left; then he would leave and speak to the children of Israel what he would be commanded.

35Then the children of Israel would see Moses' face, that the skin of Moses' face had become radiant, and [then] Moses would replace the covering over his face until he would come [again] to speak with Him.

 

כטוַיְהִ֗י בְּרֶ֤דֶת משֶׁה֙ מֵהַ֣ר סִינַ֔י וּשְׁנֵ֨י לֻחֹ֤ת הָֽעֵדֻת֙ בְּיַד־משֶׁ֔ה בְּרִדְתּ֖וֹ מִן־הָהָ֑ר וּמשֶׁ֣ה לֹֽא־יָדַ֗ע כִּ֥י קָרַ֛ן ע֥וֹר פָּנָ֖יו בְּדַבְּר֥וֹ אִתּֽוֹ:

לוַיַּ֨רְא אַֽהֲרֹ֜ן וְכָל־בְּנֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ אֶת־משֶׁ֔ה וְהִנֵּ֥ה קָרַ֖ן ע֣וֹר פָּנָ֑יו וַיִּֽירְא֖וּ מִגֶּ֥שֶׁת אֵלָֽיו:

לאוַיִּקְרָ֤א אֲלֵהֶם֙ משֶׁ֔ה וַיָּשֻׁ֧בוּ אֵלָ֛יו אַֽהֲרֹ֥ן וְכָל־הַנְּשִׂאִ֖ים בָּֽעֵדָ֑ה וַיְדַבֵּ֥ר משֶׁ֖ה אֲלֵהֶֽם:

לבוְאַֽחֲרֵי־כֵ֥ן נִגְּשׁ֖וּ כָּל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וַיְצַוֵּ֕ם אֵת֩ כָּל־אֲשֶׁ֨ר דִּבֶּ֧ר יְ-הֹוָ֛ה אִתּ֖וֹ בְּהַ֥ר סִינָֽי:

לגוַיְכַ֣ל משֶׁ֔ה מִדַּבֵּ֖ר אִתָּ֑ם וַיִּתֵּ֥ן עַל־פָּנָ֖יו מַסְוֶֽה:

לדוּבְבֹ֨א משֶׁ֜ה לִפְנֵ֤י יְ-הֹוָה֙ לְדַבֵּ֣ר אִתּ֔וֹ יָסִ֥יר אֶת־הַמַּסְוֶ֖ה עַד־צֵאת֑וֹ וְיָצָ֗א וְדִבֶּר֙ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֵ֖ת אֲשֶׁ֥ר יְצֻוֶּֽה:

להוְרָא֤וּ בְנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ אֶת־פְּנֵ֣י משֶׁ֔ה כִּ֣י קָרַ֔ן ע֖וֹר פְּנֵ֣י משֶׁ֑ה וְהֵשִׁ֨יב משֶׁ֤ה אֶת־הַמַּסְוֶה֙ עַל־פָּנָ֔יו עַד־בֹּא֖וֹ לְדַבֵּ֥ר אִתּֽוֹ:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A few points are worthy of note:

Friday, February 27, 2026

Special Clothing To Serve God Best

Parshat Tetzaveh 

by Rabbi Avi Billet

So much attention is given to the special clothing of the Kohanim, as they are described as being לכבוד ולתפארת, for honor and glory – on the one hand it is glorifying the Kohanim, putting them in a very clear position of honor, while on the other hand their uniform also glorifies God as it is a fulfillment of God’s instruction. The seeming white “simplicity” of their garments, as well as the beautifully ornate extra garments of the Kohen Gadol, stand as a testament to Whom the Kohanim are serving. 

The Sochatchover Rebbe asked what should be an obvious question. There is a whole other group that is present as well when it comes to serving in the Mishkan, namely the Leviim. And yet they do not have special garments! Why? 

Friday, February 20, 2026

Did the Ark Have Legs?

Parshat Terumah

by Rabbi Avi Billet

The first time I learned the book of Shemos, I was fascinated by the Mishkan. We had a project in 5th grade in which groups of kids made presentations about the different vessels of the Mishkan – you could make a poster, a slide presentation, or even build a mini-model – in some cases “to scale” and in some cases “actual size.” While I remember my project being the Kerashim (the beams that make up the walls of the Mishkan), I am pretty sure I limited my presentation to posterboard and diagrams, and not a model. An actual size “Keresh” would not have fit in our small classroom! 

In my fascination, I studied at length the pictures in the book “HaMishkan/The Tabernacle” (rather pricey at that link!) for which the author had made mini models, and the book was a crossover between the black and white photos that were part of the book and the color photos that were pasted into the book throughout the progress of the building of the Mishkan (it must have been much cheaper to print and assemble the book that way as color printing then was certainly not like it is now). *

This is the Aron (Ark) I remember 

Subsequent to that I (and I’m sure many readers) watched the movie “Raiders of the Lost Ark” – Steven Spielberg’s early film demonstrating his hatred for Nazis, in which the hero, Indiana Jones, survives the superpowers of the opened Ark, while the Nazis and their sympathizers all meet a beyond-nature end.