Showing posts with label anger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anger. Show all posts

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Praying To God For Real - Being a Maamin (Believer)

Rosh Hashana 5775

by Rabbi Avi Billet

          Tuesday morning many of us awoke to the news that the Shabak – Israel’s FBI – did their due diligence, and the IDF finished the job on the barbarians who kidnapped and murdered 3 teens in Israel this summer. The perps were not arrested. They will never be freed in a prisoner exchange. Baruch Hashem.

          Were we to take a look back at the year that was 5774, many of us would probably look at the events of the summer in Israel, and the backlash that continues to send EuropeanJews to seek safer locations for their families, as the defining moments of the year for the Jewish people.

          The kidnapping of Naftali Frankel, Eyal Yifrach and Gilad Shaer, HYD, the weeks that followed their kidnapping, and the uncertainty of their safety, which culminated with the discovery that they had been dead all along, and of course the summertime war which followed – which while damaging to Hamas – cost Israel 67 soldiers and 5 civilians, as well as hundreds wounded.

          We were in camp, and it was actually visiting day when I started getting reports that the ground invasion had begun, and that 13 soldiers had already been killed. I had been looking forward to seeing people, but I was inconsolable. I am sure many here cried many times over the summer. Not just over the loss of Israel’s sons, brothers and fathers, but over how Israel was demonized in the media.

          And the Arab anti-Semitism that has emerged in Europe, as well as the noted hate-incidents recorded in this country and in Canada, also served our collective memory that Naziism is alive in Europe and around the world. But instead of being Aryan, the modern Nazis are primarily Arab, or just plain bigoted anti-Semites.

          And, of course, through it all, the memory of what seemed to be the catalyst for it all, the kidnapping and brutal murder of three innocent teenagers who got into the wrong car.

          בראש השנה יכתבון וביום צום כיפור יחתמון.

          It’s a message that cuts deeply into our thoughts and emotions. Was this all decreed on Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur last year? Our liturgy, which reflects the Talmud, says so. Why couldn’t it be car accidents? A young man from Lakewood, Aaron Sofer, went missing in Yerushalayim during the conflict, feared kidnapped. Turns out he tragically died in a hiking accident. Is this kind of death any less a tragedy? No.

          But in our minds, while we always have questions, we have an easier time with the things we can relate to: accidents, illnesses, and of course old-age.

          And so it comes as such an incredibly shocking and surprising message when the mother of NaftaliFrankel appeared in an Aish.com video that many of us saw, declaring the lessons she takes from her son’s murder – of the incredible spirit of Am Yisrael, the unity, the Achdus, the power of Tefillah that rallied behind her son, Gilad and Eyal as a world-wide movement. About how this is the true Am Yisrael – a people who care about one another, who look out for one another, who are there for one another. And most importantly, of having אמונה, faith in God.

          How does this woman have faith in God? She lost her son in one of the most senseless crimes of the century! Isn’t God to blame for not protecting her son, and the boys that were with him?

          You see, Rachel Frankel understands very well that that is not how אמונה works. אמונה, real faith in God doesn’t get thrown out with the bath water the minute something goes wrong. Or in her case, tragically wrong.

          One thing you should know about Real Emunah. I found a great quote in ספר מבחר הפנינים א - שער החכמה – by Rabbi Shlomo Ibn Gabirol. He said, “Know the removal of שכל (intelligence, but sometimes translated as common sense) from Emunah is like removing a head from a body. When the head is removed, the body is lost or useless. And when Sechel is lost, Emunah is lost.”

          In other words, people who have real Emunah are not simpletons who have what the public calls Blind Faith. These are really really really really really really SMART people. They know Emunah – faith – by nature contains an element of doubt. But they also make a very intelligent choice to say, Who cares if there is a possibility that I am wrong? There is a much stronger possibility that I am so so right. This is what the Rambam at the beginning of Hilkhos Yesodei HaTorah calls ידיעה – knowing that God is there.

          Secondly, people who have Emunah don’t see things in black and white. There is a world of gray, sometimes unintelligible gray, but gray nonetheless. And that hazy gray suggests a metaphor of a world which is like a very large wheel with millions and billions of cogs – some that play a larger role, some whose role is far less significant, some whose roles are not apparent until many millions of cogs have made their revolutions. And that each of us is a cog, and we can’t always see the big picture of that wheel. Some cogs just loosen up and fall out. And the wheel keeps right on spinning.

          There are many great works of Jewish philosophy that define what Emunah is. But in the same book, Ibn Gabirol has a “Shaar Haemunah,” in which he articulates some of the fundamental tenets of what it means to be a Maamin. Humility, Reverence, and the Patience to explain to someone who has questions – who may even be antagonistic – but to be able to explain because the Maamin has clarity and confidence in how the world works and in Who is running the show.

          There are some people who endure the knocks of life better than others. The poor, the ill, and the diminished. These, says Ibn Gabirol, are the Maaminim.

          You want to know who went through the school of hard knocks? Chana did! We read it a few moments ago! She had a co-wife who made her life miserable! Her husband treated her royally, and yet she couldn’t eat – because he didn’t understand her, thinking his love for her was more meaningful than the child she yearned for. Peninah made her ANGRY that her womb was closed. Not sad. ANGRY! Can you imagine a woman who is made to feel like nothing by a seemingly heartless, mean and insensitive show-off? Chana could have walked away with her tail between her legs. But she was ANGRY!

          We all know Ka’as is a bad middah. But Ka’as, the Rambam says, has its place. While Rambam warns against anger, in Hilkhot Deot 1:4, he says that a person shouldn’t get angry, except over a big deal, so the issue won’t ever happen again.

          Chana got angry at Peninah. This WAS a big deal. But it STILL happened, year after year. So one year she decided to do something about it.

          We can analyze Chana’s story for hours. But today I think we need to focus on Chana the Maamina, and her relationship with God.

          First she prays to God, crying, bitter, and we are toldוַתִּתְפַּלֵּל עַל־יְקֹוָק . She lays it all out. She says God, “I need you to see my suffering. And remember me! Don’t forget me! You ARE IN MY LIFE! YOU ARE PART OF MY EXISTENCE! If I have a child, I will dedicate his life to serving you.”

          וַתִּתְפַּלֵּל עַל־יְקֹוָק     . She is in control. She is letting Hashem, כביכול, have it.

          But Eili gives her the business. She is praying in a way that is beyond his comprehension. And she lets him know he has misunderstood her. She tells him she is suffering. וָאֶשְׁפֹּךְ אֶת־נַפְשִׁי לִפְנֵי יְקֹוָק:.  Lifnei hashem. As she hashes it out, her relationship with God seems to change.

          And then she explains herself to Eili. כִּי־מֵרֹב שִׂיחִי וְכַעְסִי דִּבַּרְתִּי עַד־הֵנָּה: I’ve spoken this way and in this manner because of my ANGER. Rabbi David Fohrman pointed out that ANGER, at least in Chana’s case, is a demonstration of being real (we know this from the תלמוד בבלי מסכת עירובין דף סה עמוד ב  -  אמר רבי אילעאי: בשלשה דברים אדם ניכר: בכוסו, ובכיסו, ובכעסו.. ) She’s not putting on a show for God, she’s letting HIM see what she is really feeling. Because Peninah has abandoned her, her husband doesn’t seem to understand her, and Eili has just accused her of being a drunk – of being someone who pours in alcohol to escape a reality. But in fact, she was pouring OUT her soul, perhaps in anger somewhat, to REFLECT her Reality, to the only being who can hear her and understand her, and Who could connect with her in the deepest way.

          And now that it has come out, she is finally able to eat – a feat which has been inaccessible to her in all of her recent Temple-trips.

          Hashem remembers her  וַיִּזְכְּרֶהָ יְקֹוָק. She remembers Hashem when she names the child. Becauseמֵיְקֹוָק שְׁאִלְתִּיו:. She won’t go to visit the Mishkan until the child is readyוַהֲבִאֹתִיו וְנִרְאָה אֶת־פְּנֵי יְקֹוָק. And when she does come, she explains to Eili that I was the woman who stood here

           לְהִתְפַּלֵּל אֶל־יְקֹוָק:.  EL HASHEM. Not al (על), not Lifnei (לפני). El (אל). To. Close. Intimate. Face to face.  (כז) אֶל־הַנַּעַר הַזֶּה הִתְפַּלָּלְתִּי וַיִּתֵּן יְקֹוָק לִי אֶת־שְׁאֵלָתִי אֲשֶׁר שָׁאַלְתִּי מֵעִמּוֹ:

          I prayed for this child, and Hashem gave me the request I had asked of Him.

          DID YOU HEAR THAT? Chana prayed for the child. But she made a request of Hashem. The child was the afterthought – the REQUEST WAS – GOD I NEED YOU TO SEE MY SUFFERING! I NEED YOU TO SEE HOW ANGRY I AM ! I NEED YOU TO NOT FORGET ME!

          And then my על ה' becomes לפני ה', and then it turns, in retrospect to אל ה'. Intimate. Close. I davened אל ה. I davened אל הנער הזה. אלto Hashem, אלfor this child. Maybe FOR HASHEM  to be in my life. FOR this child to grace my arms.

          Her thanksgiving Tefillah – even more profound. (ב) אֵין־קָדוֹשׁ כַּיקֹוָק כִּי אֵין בִּלְתֶּךָ וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ:

          Chana came to the realization – though perhaps she knew this before – that she couldn’t rely on her husband, and even Eili, who should not have judged her but did, was at first unhelpful. The only ONE she could rely on was her own Emunah, her own knowledge, that HKBH is out there, and that He listens.

          And this is why Rachel Frankel’s message is not just special in its own right. It is amazing because here is a woman who went to a similar school of hard knocks as Chana. Not comparing childlessness to losing a child in a horrific terrorist act. But here is a woman who has every right to be angry. Every right to question God. To question His motivation. To reject Him.

          And yet, she seems ever closer. She is able to smile. She is able to share her message of inspiration. I have no doubt in my mind that - if I can borrow a line from tomorrow's Haftorah -  רחל מבכה על בניה. But what she has demonstrated is that through all the tears and all the difficult moments, she sees a much bigger wheel. A much bigger picture. She understands the concept of being a cog, and that each cog has a role. And that the bigger picture of Achdut of Am Yisrael says so much more about who we are as a people than anything.

          She lost a son. And because of it, a woman with no previous platform has chosen to remind her people that HKBH reigns, and that our People, united, can always turn to Him.

          May we be blessed to pray the way Chana did. To express our anger, our frustrations, and to be real. To come על ה, but transition to praying לפני ה, and to finish speaking אל ה. We want to be as close to God as we can. And, hopefully we’ll be blessed to come to the same conclusion these amazing women have come to.

          (ב) אֵין־קָדוֹשׁ כַּיקֹוָק כִּי אֵין בִּלְתֶּךָ וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ

Friday, February 3, 2012

Getting Angry, Speaking Calmly

Parshat B'Shalach
by Rabbi Avi Billet

After the splitting of the sea, the people begin to settle into their wilderness existence, and become the recipients of a daily dose of manna from heaven.

The instructions as to what this food is, how it is to be rationed, and how it is to be cooked and eaten are given piecemeal. In 16:19, Moshe tells the people not to leave any leftovers until the next day. Perhaps this was the precursor to every successful Passover program: no need to take leftovers to your room because there will always be a new helping of food the following morning.

For the second and last time, we find the people not listening to Moshe (the first was in 6:9, during the heart of slavery, before the plagues began). People leave food for the next day – and it spoils. Moshe's reaction is to get angry at them.

It is quite understandable why they did not listen to him in Egypt. His efforts to that point had only yielded more work and more suffering. The people, exhausted from their exertions, had not the wherewithal to listen to Moshe's promises of redemption.

In our story, however, why wouldn't they listen? After all, if the manna from heaven is so clearly a miraculous gift, and if since the last "not listening experience" you have witnessed this man bring about ten plagues, split the sea and drown your oppressors, why wouldn't you think there's something to what he's doing and saying? How could you come to ignore him completely?

Perhaps they ignored him because they were still living in a slave mentality reality. Perhaps a slave counts every morsel of food that comes his way, not believing he'll see something good again for a long time. So even though they were told not to leave anything over, either they couldn't help it because they were used to hoarding or they couldn't believe that such fresh food would literally spoil in the morning.

So why did Moshe get angry? Shouldn't he understand the mind games the people play with themselves?

A closer look at other times when Moshe gets angry with the word "Vayiktzof" may help us understand Moshe's impetus for bringing out his anger card. The commentary of the Baalei Hatosafot summarizes the three times this word is used to describe Moshe's getting angry. The other two incidents are: when Moshe's nephews do not partake of the goat sacrifice at the dedication of the Mishkan, shortly after their older brothers die; and when the soldiers return from the all-out Midianite war having spared the women of the nation they had been ordered to wipe out completely. [He also "got angry" at the Golden Calf incident, and when dealing with the Korach group – except that there the Torah uses the word "Vayee-char"]

In each case, the Baalei Hatosafot explain, Moshe forgot a law as a result of his anger: in the manna story - he forgot to tell the people not to collect manna on the seventh day; with his nephews - he forgot that after losing a close relative a mourner does not eat meat ; after the Midianite war - he forgot the laws concerning how to kosherize vessels they had seized in battle.

There are a number of common denominators in the three stories. I will focus on two of them. Firstly, the people deliberately ignored a direct command from God that had been channeled through Moshe. Secondly, Moshe was very aware that a precedent was being set as each circumstance was a first time episode.

It's a difficult balance. Sometimes anger is warranted, and sometimes anger only serves to bring a person down. In Moshe's case, the setback he suffered was that he forgot a law – God, Aharon and Elazar taught him the three laws, respectively.

But what was at stake? God's honor.

The difference between Moshe getting angry "for God's sake" and those who think "they know what God wants" is that he was the direct line, and knew exactly and explicitly what needed to be done. And, in every case, he was trying to set a precedent that people could one day turn to for guidance - namely through reading the Torah's account of precedent-setting moments.

But not everything works out "the way you want" and his personal outcome was forgetfulness. God did not get upset or punish people for violating the shabbos, for example. He just asked Moshe to give them a little rebuke. And when Moshe delivered the message as he was told, the people changed.

Sometimes an option that serves a more productive purpose than anger is saying in a clear and firm tone, "I stand for this exact thing that God said." If communicated properly and respectfully, there is a much better chance that people will listen.