Friday, July 18, 2014

To Not Lose A Man

As I post this, Israel has begun its ground offensive, and news of the first Israeli casualty of war has been announced. Saddest condolences to his family and to עם ישראל. God bless the IDF. May they eradicate Hamas מתחת השמים.

Parshat Matot

by Rabbi Avi Billet


After the battle with Midian, the Torah tells us that the generals and captains, who were officers over the army's divisions, approached Moshe. They said to him, 'We have taken a census of the warriors under our command and not a single man has been lost!” (31:48-49)
            
The Battle of Midian is one of the more horrific battles described in the Torah, at least as far as casualties and what the Children of Israel were tasked to do. Isn’t it incredible, then, that after a long and arduous battle, there are no casualties on the Israelite side?
            
Of course, the literal translation is not the only perspective on what it means to not lose a soldier. Rashbam says no one died in a plague. There are two ways to look at such a statement. It may be referring to a plague that God wrought – in other words, no one died of a sin. The other possibility is that in the history of wars, until World War II and the advent of modern medicine, it was always the case that more soldiers died of illness than on the battlefield. If no one died from illness, that was also an amazing miracle.
            
Chazal taught homiletically that “we didn’t lose a man” means “to sin” (Shabbat 64a), that no soldier fell to depravity and committed a moral error that makes the rest of us look bad. [Fascinatingly, the Baal Haturim notes – based on Yebamot 61a – that this Hebrew phrase has the same numerical value (gematria) as “La’aveirot” – “to sins” (718)]. The gemara asks, if that was the case, why did the soldiers feel a need to bring a sin offering? To atone for their souls, because they had thoughts to commit sins, though they did not act upon them. The Alshikh couched this idea as two battles – the physical battle in the trenches, and the spiritual battle which one has in one’s heart.
            
Rabbi Yochanan Luria (Meshivat Nefesh) examined the story and concluded that much of what happens to the general populace, or to the regular soldiers, is dependant upon the behavior of the leadership. In their particular case, since the princes at their time were model citizens, it became a merit for Israel – even if the soldiers plundered for themselves (in 31:53).
            
The Meshekh Chokhma adds that, in a sense, this was an admission of wrongdoing in the Baal Peor incident that concluded Parshat Balak and ran into Parshat Pinchas. The leaders are saying now, “We were able to see that when we effectively lead our men, we can prevent them from falling into moral depravity. Had we only been good leaders when the daughters of Moab came along, we could have prevented the plague that took the lives of 24,000.”
            
In a roundabout way, the Kli Yakar suggests that “We didn’t lose a man” is a follow up to the instructions of 31:17-18 of whom to kill in the war. The point of the removal of much of the civilian population was to avoid suspicion that the Israelite soldiers had ulterior motives in battle, beyond enacting the revenge that God had commanded them to conduct at the beginning of the chapter (31:2). [Read it inside – on 31:17 – to understand his comments in full.]
            
Were we living in a different time, I would probably focus on the second teaching of the Alshikh for the final lesson here. That we wage a battle with our yetzer hara (Evil Inclination) on a regular basis, and we must be able to overcome.
            
But these times are far from normal. And the State of Israel is facing an existential threat. The international community will surely yell, and call for a cease fire, and for Israel to exercise restraint, and only to utilize proportional response. But this is not how a war is won. Unless Hamas and its infrastructure (its people and its machinery/ technology) are eradicated, it is only a matter of time before they rebuild and do this all again.
            
R. Luria talked about leadership, and the Kli Yakar focused on soldiers being above suspicion. Which leads me to two concluding thoughts.
            
Israeli leadership emphasizes over and over that there is no fight with the civilian population of Gaza. But, as Bibi Netanyahu also noted, “We use missiles to protect our civilians. They use their civilians to protect their missiles.” There will unfortunately be civilian casualties because their own leadership tells them to be human shields.
            
If you haven’t read the letter written by Givati Commander Ofer Winter on his thoughts about being the Brigade that will rid the world of Hamas, you haven’t seen what Jewish leadership is all about. Google it, find it, read it, and be proud that we are part of Am Yisrael. And of what a true Jewish leader is.
            
Finally, that Israel’s soldiers should be above suspicion. I believe with a complete heart that Israel’s soldiers will do their duty and will not fall to the depraved state of committing moral sins. War is war and war is horrible. But the soldiers are duty bound to protect Israel and its citizens, and not to engage in any horrific acts against the civilian population – whether women or children (except in defense of their own lives).

            
We certainly pray that Israel “not lose a man” – not in battle, not in sin, and not psychologically, and not from disease. And that God should watch over and protect them, from every trouble, woe and injury, so they may all return safely home, to live out lives telling the story of how they saved the State of Israel, ridding it of a terrorist organization, with honor, dignity and through sanctifying God’s Name. 

No comments:

Post a Comment